Ghost Buster asked:
I’m travelling to Europe for a few days.
But I heard that Paris and London are a lot of work to enjoy, since they’re big.
And I don’t have enough money for an organized tour. I just want a compact city, that’s easy to explore on foot, and that I can tour all by mself.
So I’m thinking Amsterdam, Krakow, Stockholm. These are really compact and walkable. What do you think?
I’m travelling to Europe for a few days.
But I heard that Paris and London are a lot of work to enjoy, since they’re big.
And I don’t have enough money for an organized tour. I just want a compact city, that’s easy to explore on foot, and that I can tour all by mself.
So I’m thinking Amsterdam, Krakow, Stockholm. These are really compact and walkable. What do you think?
December 9th, 2007 by admin
Filed under: Krakow |
Filed under: Krakow |
December 10th, 2007 at 2:45 pm
amsterdam is in every case “walkable” , it seems to be walking in a museum! and everywhere you go , it’s pretty!
December 12th, 2007 at 11:23 am
I suggest you SIGHISOARA or SIBIU, in Romania. They are great. SIGHISOARA is a well preserved fortress and SIBIU is the European Cultural Captal in 2007.
December 14th, 2007 at 6:40 am
Prague is perfection.
December 15th, 2007 at 10:32 pm
Amsterdam, Vienna and Luxemburg.
December 16th, 2007 at 6:35 am
If by compact, you mean “walkable” then some are:
Amsterdam, Prague, Strasbourg, Munich, Berlin, Barcelona, Seville
December 16th, 2007 at 3:42 pm
gelnhausen is nice and small and easy to walk, hildesheim is good too, there is so much to choose from hard to say take the eurobahn and explore all of europe , that is the way to go,
December 19th, 2007 at 1:03 pm
Try Stockholm. Its gorgeous.
And remember, there is always public transport, which is cheap outside places like London.
December 19th, 2007 at 5:44 pm
Ohrid, Macedonia. beautiful and cheap…
regards